Investment
Investment Mint Us Stamp  Plate Block Collection

Investment Mint Us Stamp Plate Bl..

Foreign Direct Investment In Europe A Changing Landsca

Foreign Direct Investment In Europe..

US $78.56

1992 Mmm Investment Corp 100 Tickets Crisp Unc

1992 Mmm Investment Corp 100 Ticke..

US $1.25

Personal Investment Financial Planning In An Uncertain

Personal Investment Financial Plan..

US $75.52

Victorian Investments New Perspectives On Finance And

Victorian Investments New Perspect..

US $29.57

Making Technology Investment Profitable  Keen Jack

Making Technology Investment Profit..

US $68.70

Socially Responsible Investment In A Global Environment

Socially Responsible Investment In ..

US $92.82

Investment

Reliable investment information

stock Market Investment Website Business For Sale
US $1.53
Investment Mint Us Stamp  Plate Block Collection
US $360.95

Investment banking vs management consulting?

Question: Investment banking vs management consulting?

(Posted by: Matt Ryan on 2010-07-30 16:14:44)

Hello. I recently applied for a job at numerous companies and got offers at my top choices. I have my MBA. Goldman Sachs (investment bank) and McKinsey and Company (management consulting which is consulting companies on how to run their company) both are offering my jobs in NYC. I would love to be super rich, have a family, and become an executive of a fortune 500. I am debating on which offer I should take. Here are pros and cons. Goldman Sachs Pros- make six figures and 60 k more than McKinsey, work in NYC, get job offers at hedge funds after a few years at GS, great company to have on resume. Cons- normal work weeks are 110 hours each week, no work life balance, when you leave you most likely can only get another financial job, job growth rate is really bad, would have no time for a family. McKinsey and Company Pros- Six figures a year and seven figures when partner after 6- 8 years with the firm, great company to have on resume, normal work hours, great work life balance, have time for a family, travel only in the first few years, great benefits, most people who leave after being partner for some time go on to become fortune 500 Executives and are super rich (could easily afford a private jet and a mansion and a luxury apartment in NYC and a lamborghini), more opportunities for when you leave the firm, your role greatly impacts a huge company which is exciting. Cons- less pay than investment banker. Overall, I think McKinsey is better since even though I won't be making as much as I bankers in the first few years, when I'm partner, I'll make a ton more and when I leave, I could get a job as senior management/ executive at a fortune 500. What do you think?


Answers:

Posted by: La on 2010-07-30, 21:40:02

If you want to be a top executive at a F500 company then let us compare the alumni of both companies. The choice is apparent. en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/ Goldman_Sachs#Alumni en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/ List_of_McKinsey_%26_Company_people

  

Posted by: dk on 2010-07-30, 16:22:12

I guess one that offer something that would promote where you want to be will be good for you.

  

Powered by Yahoo! Answers®


Back to Previous page

Bookmark Investment

Sitemap | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact

© copyright 2008 PLUS Find Your Dream, All Rights Reserved.

Legal Notice: This website is powered by Amazon®, Adsense™, Ebay®, Yahoo!® Answers and Youtube™. All trademarks are copyrighted by their respective owners. Please read our terms of use and privacy policy.